The Democratic National Committee has admitted in court that they are no more “democratic” than the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
Disgruntled Democrat voters have filed a class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida alleging that the DNC and former chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz favored Hillary Clinton during the presidential nomination process.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of residents from 45 states and represents three types of plaintiffs: DNC donors, Bernie Sanders campaign donors, and any registered Democrats. Wow! That’s a LOT of people.
The plaintiffs accuse Schultz and the DNC of “intentional, willful, wanton, and malicious” conduct that violated the charter and by-laws of the DNC. We couldn’t agree more. Their conduct was wholly inappropriate.
Specifically, lawyers argue that the DNC violated Article 5 Section 4 of their charter, which requires the DNC chairperson to act with impartiality — especially between Presidential candidates. Anyone with EYES could see how THAT was violated! Maybe they should add “Americans with eyes” to their list of plaintiffs, or “Americans with common sense.”
DNC emails, which were leaked earlier this year, made it clear that Schultz and the DNC favored Clinton and disadvantaged Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
The class-action suit is hoping to receive relief for almost seven million donors who provided money to Bernie Sanders expecting a fair election process.
“There’s no contractual obligation here,” argued DNC lawyer Bruce Spiva in court. “It’s not a situation where a promise has been made that is an enforceable promise.”
Spiva goes on to explain that registered Democrats should have had no expectation of a fair election process. Further, he claims that there is nothing stopping the Democrats from selecting their nominee in a backroom negotiation without any input from voters.
Spiva’s comments need to be played on repeat leading up to the next presidential election. The Democrats have “no contractual obligation to democracy” should be known as the unofficial slogan of the establishment party. They haven’t been playing by the rules for YEARS — the only difference is, now, they’re admitting it.
It is no wonder that the Democrats nominated such an unlikable person to run for election: she was not chosen by the voters.
The mainstream media has, of course, remained silent as the case proceeds since it is actually newsworthy and has no connection to their ridiculous Trump-Russia narrative. Pathetic.
Do you think the DNC will loss this court battle? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice!