Connect with us

News

Grab the hair dye, blondie, you’re a racist! Writer slams blonde MAGA and Fox News America

The race-baiting left is obsessed with color. Except for this time, it’s not skin color but hair color.

In an inane New York magazine story, writer Amy Larocca insists Fox News channel is racist because it employs blonde TV hosts.

Predictably, Larocca blamed President Trump for the trend, which she called a “dog whistle” to racists because it exalts blonde hair. It bears noting that Trump’s wife, Melania, is a brunette. But why let facts get in the way of a media narrative?

“Fox News and Donald Trump have given blonde hair a new chapter,” Larocca wrote. “Now, blonde is the color of the right, for whom whiteness has become a hallmark.”

But what does that mean for celebrities like Beyonce, who wears blonde wigs but is celebrated as a beauty icon for black women? Is Beyonce secretly a white supremacist?

Spotlighting her own anti-blonde bigotry and aesthetic insecurities, Larocca bloviated:

And then, of course, there are the politics of hair color. Attributes associated with whiteness — light skin, narrow noses — have dominated American beauty ideals as long as there’s been such a thing.

To be blonde was to be a good American woman, pure of intention and heart — which implied also, of course, that to be a good American woman, pure of intention and heart, meant being blonde.

But #MAGA, Fox News America is a place where all the classic signifiers of privilege and wealth work on overdrive.

Using New York magazine’s reasoning, that would mean CNN is also racist. Because there’s a veritable blonde battalion on CNN’s roster of TV hosts and reporters.

Check out CNN’s blonde bevy below:


The New York magazine puff piece came on the same day that Newsweek trashed Melania Trump and first daughter Ivanka Trump for wearing high heels, claiming it’s a symbol of female oppression by the Trump administration.

Where was Newsweek’s outrage when Michelle Obama wore high heels during her eight years as first lady?

Not surprisingly, the New York magazine piece calling Fox News racist for employing blondes was trashed on social media for its idiocy.

Advertisement
9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. tim krause

    August 13, 2017 at 11:37 am

    OK, so FOX has FOXES. CNN and MSNBC has HAGS and BITCHES. What else is new, except one is a MAD COW.

  2. Pingback: Grab the hair dye, blondie, you’re a racist! Writer slams blonde MAGA and Fox News America – The Conservative Truth

  3. Sal belardo

    August 13, 2017 at 11:54 am

    Calling a women a racist for being blonde is like calling black people racist for being black! Which is more truthful? Racists when looking for racism will find it wherever they want! Someone who only wears white socks could be called a racist! Someone who only wears black shoes could be called a racist! When looking for a racist the person can find it many ways like the writer recently who said that women are racist because they wouldn’t get out of his way on the side walk! Racists will find it, they just have to use their imagination! Like this fool!

  4. Stephen Bullock

    August 13, 2017 at 12:11 pm

    What about Hillary Clinton and Chelsea, and Elizabeth Warren. Does that mean that they are racist too?

  5. Pingback: Grab the hair dye, blondie, you’re a racist! Writer slams blonde MAGA and Fox News America

  6. Pingback: Grab the hair dye, blondie, you’re a racist! Writer slams blonde MAGA and Fox News America – Conservative Politics

  7. Billye

    August 13, 2017 at 4:00 pm

    Amy, since you are so jealous just dye your hair! Waaaaay tired of all the whining and crying!

  8. billy miller

    August 13, 2017 at 4:57 pm

    WHITES RIGHT, SHIT IS BROWN.

  9. Louisa

    August 14, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    You wonder why consumers are not buying magazines or newspapers anymore. Ms. Larocca’s sophomoric essay is just another reason to keep walking passed the news stand. This is idiot fodder and insulting to Americans who anticipate some intellectual stimulation from the periodicals they purchase.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News57 mins ago

Trump Ordered DOJ to Investigate Claims of Spying on His Campaign — Now, They’re Responding

News57 mins ago

Hillary Clinton Jabs Trump and Declares She’s ‘Not Over’ Losing the Election During Yale Law Speech

News2 hours ago

Last week, reports indicated Stefan Halper, a Cambridge professor and longtime aide to some of Washington’s most powerful figures, was outed as an FBI informant planted inside Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The New York Post writes: Halper made his first overture when he met with Page at a British symposium. The two remained in regular contact for more than a year, meeting at Halper’s Virginia farm and in Washington, DC, as well as exchanging emails. The professor met with Trump campaign co-chair Sam Clovis in late August, offering his services as a foreign-policy adviser, The Washington Post reported Friday, without naming the academic. … Days later, Halper contacted Papadopoulos by e-mail. The professor offered the young and inexperienced campaign aide $3,000 and an all-expenses-paid trip to London, ostensibly to write a paper about energy in the eastern Mediterranean region. Here are a few fast facts about Halper’s history in politics. Got His Start in Nixon/Ford Years The Stanford and Oxford-educated Halper started his career in government in 1971 as a member of President Richard Nixon’s Domestic Policy Council. The foreign policy expert served as the Office of Management and Budget’s Assistant Director of Management and Evaluation Division between 1973-1974. Halper then served as an assistant to all three of President Gerald Ford’s Chief of Staffs — Alexander Haig, Donald Rumsfeld, and Dick Cheney — until 1977. Accused of Leading a Spy Ring Inside Jimmy Carter’s Presidential Campaign The Reagan-Bush presidential campaign hired Halper to serve as Director of Policy Coordination in 1980 and would later be embroiled in the Debategate affair, a scandal in which CIA operatives were accused of leaking the Carter campaign’s foreign policy positions to the Republican ticket. The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald reports: Four decades ago, Halper was responsible for a long-forgotten spying scandal involving the 1980 election, in which the Reagan campaign – using CIA officials managed by Halper, reportedly under the direction of former CIA Director and then-Vice-Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush – got caught running a spying operation from inside the Carter administration. The plot involved CIA operatives passing classified information about Carter’s foreign policy to Reagan campaign officials in order to ensure the Reagan campaign knew of any foreign policy decisions that Carter was considering. Halper also worked as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs during President Ronald Reagan’s first term. Had a Stint as a Bank Executive In 1984, Halper was chairman of three financial institutions — National Bank of Northern Virginia, Palmer National Bank, and George Washington National Bank. White House official Oliver North wired loaned funds from the Palmer National Bank to a Swiss bank account, which were later used to aid the contras. Believed Hillary Clinton Would Be a Better Steward for U.S.-UK Relations In March 2016, Halper told Russia’s Sputnik News that he believed then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton would prove to be a steadier hand in preserving the “special relationship” enjoyed by the United States and Britain. “I believe Clinton would be best for US-UK relations and for relations with the European Union. Clinton is well-known, deeply experienced and predictable. US-UK relations will remain steady regardless of the winner although Clinton will be less disruptive over time,” Halper said.

News3 hours ago

Who Is Stefan Halper? Meet the ‘FBI Informant’ Inside Trump’s 2016 Campaign

News4 hours ago

GOP Sets Fundraising Record in April as Democrat Money Woes Extend into Midterms

News4 hours ago

Leave It to Al Sharpton to Find a Reason to Make the Royal Wedding All About ‘White Male Supremacy’

CF