Connect with us

News

Illinois County Declares Itself a Sanctuary…for Gun Owners

While California has been all over the news for its “sanctuaries” for undocumented immigrants, one county in Illinois has a totally different idea: a sanctuary for gun owners.

According to the Associated Press, the Effingham County Board passed a resolution on an 8-1 vote Monday to agree not to enforce new Illinois laws that “unconstitutionally restrict the Second Amendment.” Bryan Kibler, the county’s attorney, told the Effingham Daily News that the resolution is mostly symbolic and will not impact decisions made at the sheriff’s office.

If the state did pass a law that impacted Second Amendment rights, Sheriff Dave Mahon stated he would have to talk with the Illinois Sheriff’s Association as well as the state’s attorney before making any decisions.

Deerfield Village in Illinois recently voted to ban all semi-automatic guns, including pistols and shotguns with “certain features,” as well as anything larger than a 10-round magazine. The village told its residents that if they did not turn in their banned weapons, it could result in a fine as high as $1,000 per day.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Tana Bouquet

    April 20, 2018 at 4:07 pm

    Alright!!! Now this is a GOOD MOVE!!!!! weapons keep us free, who knows when you are out and about and see a rattler …:-)

  2. Wayne B.

    April 20, 2018 at 4:09 pm

    Is not the 2nd adm just being thrown out the door here..If there are any elected folks in law enforcement that try and enforce this they are playing with fire.Im quite sure you would not and should not get elected agin…

    • Nick Carter

      April 20, 2018 at 4:54 pm

      The Liberals don’t intend being reelected. They intend to stay after they disarm you what are you going to do about it if they refuse to step down. The Second Amendment is not about the right to carry a weapon but to use it to defend your self, your family, your town, your state and your country against insurrection. Here is what four Supreme Court judges have rules when facing Democrats sneaky attempts in court to withdraw the Second Amendment.

      In the Case Silveira vs Lokyer :-

      “The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances, where all other rights have failed – where government has refused to stand for re-election and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable those contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people, only get to make once.

      Refer to Kleinfield 5997-99. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not have been so easily herded into cattle cars (that led to their genocide).

      Many atrocities (of the past one hundred years), could have been avoided or mitigated, has the perpetrators known their intended victims, were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here (USA).

      The Supreme Court held in Heller that the right to keep and bear arms is a right of individuals. The Supreme Court also later held in McDonald v. Chicago,[6] in 2010, that the Second Amendment is an incorporated right,[7] meaning that it is applicable to state governments as well as the Federal government.

      In my view, the judgement in the paragraph above, gives Americans the right to take up arms as a militia (the incorporated right) to protect your President; stop Meuller’s attempted impeachment of President Trumps as a means to insurrection.

      I have no doubt whatsoever that Obama brought the United Nations’ Army (supposed peace keepers) into the USA to take over the USA, once the Second Amendment is repealed. The ferocity of the Liberals under Ombama’s Administration have made it patently clear that f they had the power, they like Ma se Tung, Kora’s Kim, Robert Mugabes, Kenneth Launda, Kabila, Kenyatta, Nyrere and many other Socialists would have effected a coupe if US People were disarmed.

      History shows Socialist governments disarmed their people before effecting a murderous cultural revolution like that demanded under the Quran, “Turn them out wherever they may be, and kill them so they shall not forget before accepting peace.” Although seemingly irreligious people, I believe Hitler, Stalin, Kim, Mao se Tung and many African and Asian leaders are Stanists: at least they do behave like it. They murder tens of thousands if not millions to forcing their new order upon their citizens.

      To conclude, you are well advised to heed these judges to have seen the real benefit of keeping the American People freed through the right to defend themselves. Criminalisation of that right is the path to a one party state and centuries of domination under the satanic New World Order envisages and promised by George Soros, working to for the Rotheschild’s Illumination.

      Americans Left or Right are mad to give their Second Amendment rights away. Please copy and pass on this message to everyone you know, Left Moderate & Right.Most people don’t know.

  3. JACK Scarpon

    April 20, 2018 at 4:22 pm

    EFFINGHAM IS NOT WHAT WORRIES ME… ITS THAT DAMN DEERFIELD CRAZY LIBTURDS THAT DO!!THY MAY HAVE A WAR ZONE IN THERE!!

  4. Alean Stoops

    April 20, 2018 at 4:24 pm

    This is not how our Constitution works it can not be changed here and there.The states do not have the power to change the constitution.Our second amendment is so we can protect our family & self from such Government over reach. Every country that has allowed the government to unarm them has LOST ALL RIGHTS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF