Connect with us

News

WATCH: Trey Gowdy Just Made 5 Words Announcement About Susan Rice That Will Her In Jail Forever

The former United States National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, is caught up in a political fight over surveillance again. She has refused to testify before Congress regarding the investigation of Russian interference into the 2016 U.S. election.

“There are other ways to invite people other than via a letter,” Gowdy said. Before adding the 5 words that made Susan Rice shake with fear, “There are things called subpoenas.”

Representative Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.) was interviewed on Fox News by Bill Hemmer and stated that Congress may subpoena Rice to testify about the unmasking.

He also said Congress and lawyers don’t choose the people to testify, the facts of the case do. Rice is a very important fact witness and will appear, willingly or not.

Senator Lindsey Graham announced on Tuesday that he wanted Rice, whom many Republicans have long despised, to appear before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism. By declining the invitation she definitely looks like she’s hiding something.

The far-reaching justification she gave for “declining the invitation” was that the chairman and ranking member of the committee had not signed it. Even Democratic Senators aren’t buying that excuse. Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein stated that she had never heard of such a thing. Feinstein also said that Rice had appeared on many news program to speak on the subject and has urged her to reconsider not testifying.

Do you think she should be subpoenaed? Sound off and let us know your thoughts in the comments section below!

Continue Reading
Advertisement
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Pamela Nichols

    May 6, 2017 at 1:25 am

    Yes , how can she not have to testify…

    We would have to !

    • ken walton

      May 6, 2017 at 2:00 am

      YES !

  2. Tom

    May 6, 2017 at 2:53 am

    Yes. There isn’t any way she can turn it down without a little bit of jail time for contempt.

  3. Sharon

    May 6, 2017 at 5:15 pm

    Yes, Send her to jail for Contempt.

  4. Darlene

    May 7, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    She should testify, but don’t expect any answers from her. She’ll just pull replies from the Clinton playbooks, like; I don’t recall, take the 5th, or just downright lie.

  5. Darlene

    May 7, 2017 at 8:48 pm

    She should testify, but don’t expect any answers from her. She’ll just pull replies from the Clinton playbooks, like; I don’t recall, take the 5th, or just downright lie. She should then be held for contempt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF