Devious liberals are hoping to have their cake and eat it too – and the mainstream media is happy to play along.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) prevented federal law enforcement from investigating their servers after the hack leading Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), to ask if, “there may be something else on that server that they didn’t want law enforcement to see?”
Almost 30,000 emails belonging to the DNC were leaked and subsequently published by WikiLeaks in June 2016. The leak had severe ramifications on the ongoing presidential election.
Many Democrats have credited the email leak for their historic election loss. Seeing the inside operations of the DNC dissuaded potential supporters from electing Hillary Clinton.
The Clinton presidential campaign was already struggling to overcome the leak of John Podesta’s private emails which included damaging information such as transcripts of Clinton’s private Wall Street speeches.
The email leak was devastating to the DNC. However, this begs the question. If the leak was so devastating, why would the DNC prevent the FBI or Department of Homeland Security from investigating?
Former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson testified before the House Intelligence Committee yesterday confirming that the DNC refused to grant his department access to the email server.
Johnson explained that he was troubled by the decision. Homeland Security offered to help patch any vulnerabilities present in the server. Instead, the DNC hired the private cyber security company CrowdStrike to probe the server. CrowdStrike was later revealed to have ties to Hillary Clinton.
However, this raises an important question. Why would the DNC prevent the proper authorities from investigating their hacked server? Democrats are fuming over obstruction of justice, yet they were the first to stop a serious inquiry into supposed Russian interference.
There are two possible explanations for the DNC decision. Perhaps, as Trey Gowdy suggests, the DNC is hiding something much worse on their servers; worse than what was revealed in 2016.
Alternatively, the source of the leak may have been a disgruntled DNC employee – such as Seth Rich. The DNC could have blocked federal authorities from investigating because it would have revealed that Russia had no connection to the leak.
What do you think about this comment below.